為期兩周的聯(lián)合國氣候大會(第21次締約方會議 COP21)正在巴黎舉行,會議主會場位于巴黎市郊的布爾歇展覽中心,靠近布爾歇機(jī)場,暫時(shí)用作會議場館的展覽中心內(nèi)部還稍有些寒意。目前,第一周會議已經(jīng)結(jié)束,中國代表團(tuán)似乎顯得很輕松。中國國家主席習(xí)近平的演講為中國代表團(tuán)在巴黎的第一周談判開了一個(gè)好頭,習(xí)近平和其他政治領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人一樣,在演講中表示支持大會達(dá)成強(qiáng)有力的氣候協(xié)議。這第一周談判收尾時(shí),阿里巴巴集團(tuán)創(chuàng)始人兼首席執(zhí)行官馬云在氣候大會上發(fā)表了一場主題演講。他解釋說自己堅(jiān)持要來參加氣候大會,并說道中國民眾因?yàn)樗拈L相戲稱他是外星人,“我目睹了那么多朋友(因?yàn)榭諝馕廴荆┗及┌Y住院,我真希望自己是外星人,這樣我就能回自己的星球去了。”
除了習(xí)近平主席和馬云的演講,中國代表團(tuán)團(tuán)長解振華以及資深首席談判代表蘇偉都非常積極地參與了這周的公開討論和其他邊會活動。同時(shí),幕后技術(shù)團(tuán)隊(duì)也在努力確定協(xié)議草案,將內(nèi)容限制在可控范圍之內(nèi)。接下來一周,各國部長將接過談判的接力棒,在會議主席、法國外交部長洛朗·法比尤斯的主持下,就主要的爭議點(diǎn)進(jìn)行談判,努力達(dá)成協(xié)議。
中國代表團(tuán)似乎比之前更加自信、更加開放:中國館積極主持召開了一系列活動,邀請了商界代表、民間社會、專家以及政府代表前來參加。其中,國外代表的參與更是表明了中國希望在接下來的會談和行動中扮演更加積極開放的角色。中國的公共外交——以及去年中美氣候協(xié)議帶來的友好姿態(tài)——在一周的積極活動中取得了回報(bào)。
伊莎貝爾?希爾頓,中外對話的首席執(zhí)行官及總編。
Based in a series of chilly temporarily-equipped buildings near Le Bourget airport in the Paris suburbs, China’s delegation seemed relaxed at the mid-point of the two-week United Nations climate conference (COP21). Their week had begun with an address by President Xi Jinping, who joined other political leaders in expressing support for a robust agreement, and ending with a barnstorming speech from Jack Ma, founder and CEO of Alibaba, one of China’s most successful companies.
Explaining that people in Beijing thought he was from ‘a(chǎn)nother planet’ when he insisted on coming to the climate conference, Ma said: “When I see so many friends in hospital with cancer (from air pollution) I wish I was on another planet and could go back there.”
During a week bookended by speeches from China’s president and the country’s richest businessman, the head of China’s delegation, the genial Xie Zhenhua, and the veteran chief negotiator Su Wei, both put in numerous appearances in public discussions and side events. Technical teams worked behind the scenes to bring the draft agreement text down to manageable proportions.
In the second week, ministers take over, their task to negotiate the outstanding points of disagreement and reach a deal, under the guidance of the French foreign minister Laurent Fabius, the chair of the conference.
The Chinese delegation also seemed more confident and increasingly open than previous climate conferences.The Chinese pavilion hosted an active programme of events that included business, civil society, expert and government voices, and the presence of a number of non-Chinese contributors reinforced the impression that China wanted to play an open and positive role in both the talks and the action that will follow. China’s public diplomacy—and the continuing goodwill engendered by the US-China climate deal last year—paid off during a week of intense negotiations at the most important climate summit since Copenhagen in 2009.
But aside from China’s positive ‘mood music’, questions have been raised about China’s negotiating position on the details of a potential Paris text. At previous sessions of UN climate talks, China has positioned itself as a defender of the most vulnerable, but in the closed door talks in Paris, Chinese negotiators supported the Venezuelan and Saudi Arabian delegations, both of whom are notorious for their efforts to derail an agreement on one issue of central importance to the most vulnerable countries, and small island states in particular.
For countries such as the Marshall Islands, where a rise in sea levels is already forcing people to leave their homes, the ambition to keep global average temperature rise below 2C is not enough. They want the world’s leaders to adopt a 1.5C target, in order to give their small nations a chance of survival. Saudi Arabia, China and Venezuela all opposed that this week. In the case of Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, counties with oil-dependent economies, self-interest is a clear motive. But China, as an emerging world power, is expected to have a much more varied range of interests. China’s position will be closely observed in the coming week. Will it position itself in support of the most vulnerable? Or quietly put the brakes on the ambition of the Paris agreement?